제발 정신쫌 차리시길 .... 오바마는 독제자적 인상을 마니 가지고 있고.... campaign donor list를 보면 이인간이 서민을 위한사람이 아니란걸 곳아실겁니다...... 미국이 경제적으로 망하고 나면 미국이 아마 공산주의적 정치경향을 마니 보게 되실겁니다..... 제발 무슨 rock star 같이 행동 하는 인간에 넘어가지 마시길 .....
tis//
넌 절대적인 바보인거냐..아니면 절대적인 ㅄ인거냐..
미국은 선거자금이 개인이라 기업들한테 무쟈게 받는다. 또 기업들은 한넘에게만 주는게 아니라 양쪽다에게 준다. 이 기업들은 그리고 무수히 많은 PAC을 만들어 돈제한이 걸려있는 선거법을 우회해가곤 한단다..
고작 이것때문에 서민을 위한 사람이 아니라고 하면, 누가 서민을 위한 대통령임? 장난치냐?
그리고 공산주의적 이 아니고 사회주의적인거다...뭘좀 알고 나불대라 요즘 알바들한테도 기본지식은 가르친다던데 넌뭐냐.. 민주당의 의료보험 국영화, 사회복지 확대, 노후보장(SS), 기업규제강화 이게 전통적인 민주당의 방식들중 대표적인것들이다. 물론 반대파인 공화당에서 공산주의적인거라고 떠들어댔었다..."몇십년전에"
이젠 그게 안먹히니까 "사회주의"적이라고 말한다. 너 무슨 공화당 충견이냐?
만약 이런 정책들이 싫으면, 당장 한국에다 의료보험 민영화 해달라고 해라 미국꼴나게^^ 왜 싫어?
you really should listen to real story behind this government.... you know nothing but the main strean news.... why dont you study Adolf Hitler before you say anything
look at something like "911 truth" or "Genetically modified organism" US gov isnt for the people....
these big companies(who put their money in Obama's pocket) control government.....
Listen moron, there's no such thing as behind story that we can talk about. All we can is to gather the facts as much as we can and talk about them. you suggest that we should talk about "the story behind the story" that's not even confirmed. We have other words for that, "conspiracy theory" if you wanna stick to that, that's fine by me. just don't come here and say like iz the fact u idiot.
now lez talk about the patriot act. The real power behind george w. bush was radical republicans called, Neo-conservative, or NeoCon. They existed since 1973 and they finally got the power in 2001.Neocons are hated by democracts and even hated by true conservatives. Their top priority is national insterests. so whenever national interests conflict with other issues like civil liberties and welfare of states, they think its right thing to overrule them.
From that radicalism, the patriot act was born, the Bush doctrine(Pre-emptitive Strike) was born. The Difference between the patriot act and existing federal law is that under the patriot act, the government can extract infromation such as personal records without the consent that inlcudes unauthorized wire-tapping, detain without representation, etc. The bush administration also made it clear that torture on terrorists that are not covered by Geneva convention is legitimate.
you're right about one thing but completely distorted ther others.
Obama has consistently said that he would support a patriot act if 3 basic civil liverties are preserved. Listen. American people overwhelmingly supported afghanistan war in order to catch osama bin laden and its harboring regime, Taliban.
What they didn't like was iraq war. So people still supports war against terrorism and taliban. In oder to do that the patriot act is necessary. but obama's point and democract's point is that you don't need to sacrafice basic civil liberties. Obama said the government can obtain personal records through proper channels such as Administrative Subpeona and national security letter that are subject to judicial review.
He also cosponsored a bill in 2005 called SAFE(Security and Freedom and Enhancement) that act as safeguard against privacy and civil liberty violations that occurs under the patriot act. The bill requires the government to acquire specific warrant with every detail in oder to wiretap citizens.
Obama also joined a filibuster to block bush version of patriot act which heavily strips civil liberties. In US, Filibuters is something that you risk your political life.
Now about naomi wolf...This is great. One "radical author" argues about one thing and and you're believing it like the bible. Did you even go to high school?
What the hell is wrong with you radicals in both aisle?
It's just one god-damn author. Just because this author "ARGUES" something, does it automatically become an ultimate truth? you're the fascinating idiot and ignorant.
now you told me to look at 911 truth and GMOs.
911 truth. What the hell is the truth? All i see are bunch of speculations and conspiracy theories. What truth are you talking about? Are you a Bush Administrion Insider who was in a loop? Probably NOT. This is amazing. When 1 person says something, iz a joke. when tens of people say it, it becomes a rumor. when hundres and thousands of ppl say it, it becomes truth to certain moron like "tis".
This is truly amazing.
Lez talk abot GMO. Before we do that lez get something straight. Food industries generally don't like democracts. More regulations means more guidelines. If you really wanna think the president's policy is solely driven or heavily influenced by how much money the companies chipped in, then it means you have absolutely no knowledge in presidential politics.
Speaking of GMO and the campaign money.
the top 20 biggest obama's donors are universities, movie industries, tech industries, and financial industries. NO FOOD INDUSTRY YOU MORON.
Plus, on the first day of his office, Obama gave an excutive order that bans lobbying in his administration.
Now, If you don't wanna be insulted, then don't act like an idiot. Simple as that.
You told me not to insult you before study. Well guess what, i'm majoring in political science and will graduate this June. I'm pretty sure that i know more than you do about US goverments and its behavior, characteristics of past administrations, make up of cabinet body, and their stands on policies.
I'll say it again. you're fool not because you lack in knowledge. But because you don't know how to gather and filter the information. How can you reference me to a single radical activists and completely ignores other factors and other opposing groups? How can you reference me to 911 truth that's based on speculations and say its the truth? How can you reference me to GMO and completely ignores how the policy decision works? Let me say it again. You're a fool.
Finally, you said about New World Order. Do you even know what it means?
I can't even believe that i'm arguring with a little child. YES I want new world oder. Because the current world order makes US the leader of all and has too much power that can be abusive. I want a new world order as a coalition body that each country has equal representation.
Are you a US Lover? saying like new world order is wrong and current world order is the best since US Dominates any other?
Clearly, you have no clue of Past and current world order make up.